I think the original one is better. It only shows a half of the structure. It think it’s better if the background is also included along with the entire structure.
We cant really see the water your referring too or anything under the bridge really. But the bridge itself looks ancient i bet it carries a lot of memories.
12 Comments
Danielle M
1982 is a long time, it amazeme how this type of cosntruction ca last so long .
jolly555
This bridge looks so familiar but I don’t think I have seen it really because of the age. you capture this one well.
Maury Cheskes
That’s a really regal bridge. The colours are beautiful. I’m surprised it’s still in good form after so many decades.
Obalade Damilola
Good picture.. Beautifully captured…I love this photograph
Roy
The sky looks amazing here. So beautiful and peaceful 🙂
Meg W
If this was built in 1982 it sure has held up well. It’s in very good condition.
Patricia
Awesome woodwork on this. It must have been built by some talented people.
Oliver
This picture has a warm nostalgic feel to it. I’m in love with it.
Daphne
I wish I could see the water under it. Great job on the photo!
Miaka Yuuki
Just curious where is the original shot? This does not look like a bridge but then again this is the alternate. The original might be different.
meldred24
I think the original one is better. It only shows a half of the structure. It think it’s better if the background is also included along with the entire structure.
roberachi
We cant really see the water your referring too or anything under the bridge really. But the bridge itself looks ancient i bet it carries a lot of memories.